Wearables are not (yet) a thing

-
This article was first published by dmcityview.com

When a new computing platform emerges it seems the our initial reaction is that of a four year-old on Christmas morning. At the age of four kids have reached the cognitive capability to anticipate the importance of Christmas morning, but not really the ability discern between a truly stellar gift and underwhelming that’s been nicely wrapped. While not all new tech platforms underwhelm, the misses all seem to hit with a fervid marketing scheme followed by a tepid consumer response. Right now no sector of the tech consumer space is seeing the tide turn quicker than that of wearables.
Apple, Sony, FitBit, Google, Garmin, and hundreds more wearable manufacturers REALLY want you slap a tiny computer on your wrist or face. These little gadgets allow you to monitor your heartbeat, send and receive short messages, get directions, receive app notifications and other features that apparently aren’t convenient enough on our smartphones. Of course hightech bracelets and headsets are billed as the great emancipator of the mobile addicted, but considering most wearables must be sync-ed with said phones to unlock all features, they’re not so much an a replacement as an add on.
Still to truly understand the marketplace’s indifference to wearable tech, look no further than the most high profile gadget in the field. Last spring, the Apple Watch was released to a supposedly eager tech community. Every mainstream and tech obsessed news outlet covered the event as if every man, woman, and child were moments away from owning their luxury wrist computer. So with all that coverage, one year later Apple has never formally released the number of Watches sold. Market estimates have set the number of units sold between 5 and 7 million, but Apple has suspiciously neither confirmed nor denied that figure.

Even without a formal acknowledgement, inquiring minds need look no further to the Apple Watch’s sales struggles than last month’s Apple new product announcement. Every major Apple gadget got a tech refresh, minus the Watch, which only received a new line up of wristbands. Nothing screams corporate confidence like fancy new leather.
Of course just because consumers are less than fanatical over digital wristbands and glasses, that doesn’t mean the wearables don’t have a future. Healthcare looks to be ground zero for wearable interest. Beyond wristbands and headsets, doctors and researchers are looking for sensor technology that can read the human condition from every garment you can imagine. Whereas consumer tools mostly sense body temperature and pulse, healthcare innovations look to record and breakdown a patient’s condition from various bodily fluids, plus muscle, hair, and skin conditions.
While the medical community is practically frothing at the mouth to try on the latest in wearable tech, the entertainment community has recently dipped its toe into the waters as well. As odd as it may sound, last year’s man-verse-nature film The Revenant gauged audience reactions to the film with pulse pounding thrills with high tech wristbands recording their heart rates and breathing while watching the film. Apparently Revenant audiences held their breath, sat motionless, and saw their heart rates sky rocket for the entire two and hour film. While the film was hotly anticipated with its oscar winning filmmaking team and Leonardo DiCaprio in the lead role, the studio’s expectations went over the moon thanks to wearable data.

So it seems if Apple can’t seem to make the wearable market take off, other industries are itching to do it themselves. Even if you may not choose be wearing a smart watch, ring, glasses, or glove any time soon, it looks like your doctor or employer might eventually force it.

Patrick Boberg is a central Iowa creative media specialist. For more tech insights, follow him on Twitter @PatBoBomb

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FCC to the net neutrality rescue

-
This article was first published by  dmcityview.com In case you haven’t heard, the last couple of weeks have been pretty big concerning the future of the Internet. Net Neutrality, a term that means everything and nothing, depending on your web literacy, was for all intents and purposes cemented in the Federal Communications Commission’s book of regulations. The simple explanation on what this means to you is that the Internet will continue to be the fast-moving, cat meme-filled, pornography-laden super highway it has always been — i.e., no changes. The complicated explanation takes much concentration, so grab a cup of coffee and maybe a protractor because, seriously, this is important. At this point there’s no way around it — we all take the Internet for granted. It is the most important and intricate communication tool ever invented, and every time you turn on a web-enabled device you expect it to be there. Well, truthfully there is no “there” to it. The Internet isn’t a place,...
Read more

Tech Talk: Tune in to network TV, but for a fee

-
This article was first published by  dmcityview.com The rise of high-speed Internet and online streaming video over the last decade has definitely shaken the broadcast and pay TV business. While burgeoning Web technology has contributed to lower ratings and dipping revenues, it appears what the TV industry is most afraid of is a tool older than the medium itself, the antenna. Aereo , an online streaming video service, leases customers dime-sized antennas that retransmit locally broadcasted TV content over the Internet. This means someone living in Oregon can lease an Aereo antenna deployed in New York City and watch TV content hours before its broadcast in his or her actual time zone. The streaming video start-up has upset the broadcast TV industry so much, it’s scheduled to defend its legality before the United States Supreme Court in April. Broadcasters are challenging Aereo’s legal right to stream their content online without paying providers retransmission fees. Cable pro...
Read more

Continuing Education and the ISU Futures Forum

-
Image
Last Friday I had the unexpected pleasure of taking pictures for the Iowa State University Greenlee School of Journalism's Future's Forum. A couple week's earlier I was given the photog assignment, but few details except for a handful of choice people to photograph. It wasn't until I showed up that I found out it was a Greenlee event (a school I have a little history with). It turns out the "Futures Forum" is a chance for current journalism students to hear from industry execs, ISU grads in the field and  current  students with unique intern experience. This year's panel was made of a senior editor at Better Homes & Gardens, an Ag magazine exec, an graduate who now works at ESPN and a student who recently interned for Rolling Stone and Maxim. For the majority of the forum I was looking for different photography angles, but after the M.C. held a cheer for the recently deceased and beloved professor, Barbara Mack, and announced the topic, my interes...
Read more