Goodbye Google, We Hardly Knew Thee

-
This article was first published by dmcityview.com

There are big companies like Ford or 3M, and then there massive companies like General Electric or ExxonMobil. Now Ford generates more revenue than General Electric, but G.E. is more diverse company that makes it seem like it might own half the planet. In technology an easy equivalent is Apple and Google; Apple’s revenue is more than double that of Google, but Apple is a consumer technology developer, Google is a firm that explores every possible avenue of technological innovation. To that end, Google is about to make the leap from big to massive.
Early this month Google decided it no longer wanted to be Google and unveiled plans to create a parent company named Alphabet. Google will still exist, but not as an all encompassing tech umbrella that absorbs and acquires other properties rebranding them Google That or Google That. See three years ago when Google acquired Motorola, the popular refrain was Motorola didn’t feel like a Google property. Was Google going to rework the cell phone manufacturer and rebrand it “Google Mobile”?

The kind of awkward scenario will no longer exist. With Alphabet as the new parent company, properties such as Google Search, YouTube, Android, etc. will be self-operating machines that over time will prove their merit all on their own. Alphabet will be the “holding” company that guides the direction of the separate arms, allowing each to thrive or dive. Under the reorganization, failed or risky ventures (think Google Plus or Google Plus) won’t impact all Alphabet entities but be the moonshot that simply missed the mark.
Truth be told, Alphabet seems like a opposite field reaction to the failure of Google Plus. Four years ago, Google went all-in on an integrated ecosystem where all of it's properties were connected through Google Plus accounts. Comments on YouTube were suddenly from Google Plus accounts. Online documents and spreadsheets created in Google Drive were suddenly being shared through Google Plus. Calendar Events and Gmail information were automatically integrated through Plus.

Google Plus was not so much a failure, as a falter. Users simply didn’t flock to the forced social network. YouTube fans revolted, Drive users were mystified by the middle man, Gmail users felt like the few shreds of privacy they had were being ripped apart. Becoming a spiderweb of technology, while seeming like a brilliant move actually but it erased the entire democratic nature of internet. No one wants to be forced into commitment, let alone an interlocking network of commitments.
Alphabet is a 180 degree turn from Google Plus. No more shotgun tech weddings, but an ecosystem that shares an aesthetic and modus operandi. If Alphabet were to acquire Motorola now, the company moves would be obvious: standalone, restructure to Google efficiencies, and make the best products possible. As clear as that is now, this lesson should have been learned 10 years ago when Google acquired YouTube. Why didn’t Google turn YouTube into Google Video? Because YouTube had such a solid standalone brand, and even though Google’s number two entity after Search, it has never been mistaken for Google’s mirror image.

Alphabet is finally implementing the lesson of YouTube. Anyone invited to the Alphabet dinner party needs not only brings their own dish but isn’t forced to eat anyone else’s. It’s a brilliant move to entice innovation and protect employee dreams. Employees at Alphabet entities don’t need to worry their ideas might be repurposed for Google concerns, their innovations are siloed to their own purpose. As far as I see it, there’s never been a better time to be a Google- er, I mean Alphabet fanboy, employee, or hater.


Patrick Boberg is a central Iowa creative media specialist. For more tech insights, follow him on Twitter @PatBoBomb

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FCC to the net neutrality rescue

-
This article was first published by  dmcityview.com In case you haven’t heard, the last couple of weeks have been pretty big concerning the future of the Internet. Net Neutrality, a term that means everything and nothing, depending on your web literacy, was for all intents and purposes cemented in the Federal Communications Commission’s book of regulations. The simple explanation on what this means to you is that the Internet will continue to be the fast-moving, cat meme-filled, pornography-laden super highway it has always been — i.e., no changes. The complicated explanation takes much concentration, so grab a cup of coffee and maybe a protractor because, seriously, this is important. At this point there’s no way around it — we all take the Internet for granted. It is the most important and intricate communication tool ever invented, and every time you turn on a web-enabled device you expect it to be there. Well, truthfully there is no “there” to it. The Internet isn’t a place,...
Read more

Tech Talk: Tune in to network TV, but for a fee

-
This article was first published by  dmcityview.com The rise of high-speed Internet and online streaming video over the last decade has definitely shaken the broadcast and pay TV business. While burgeoning Web technology has contributed to lower ratings and dipping revenues, it appears what the TV industry is most afraid of is a tool older than the medium itself, the antenna. Aereo , an online streaming video service, leases customers dime-sized antennas that retransmit locally broadcasted TV content over the Internet. This means someone living in Oregon can lease an Aereo antenna deployed in New York City and watch TV content hours before its broadcast in his or her actual time zone. The streaming video start-up has upset the broadcast TV industry so much, it’s scheduled to defend its legality before the United States Supreme Court in April. Broadcasters are challenging Aereo’s legal right to stream their content online without paying providers retransmission fees. Cable pro...
Read more

Continuing Education and the ISU Futures Forum

-
Image
Last Friday I had the unexpected pleasure of taking pictures for the Iowa State University Greenlee School of Journalism's Future's Forum. A couple week's earlier I was given the photog assignment, but few details except for a handful of choice people to photograph. It wasn't until I showed up that I found out it was a Greenlee event (a school I have a little history with). It turns out the "Futures Forum" is a chance for current journalism students to hear from industry execs, ISU grads in the field and  current  students with unique intern experience. This year's panel was made of a senior editor at Better Homes & Gardens, an Ag magazine exec, an graduate who now works at ESPN and a student who recently interned for Rolling Stone and Maxim. For the majority of the forum I was looking for different photography angles, but after the M.C. held a cheer for the recently deceased and beloved professor, Barbara Mack, and announced the topic, my interes...
Read more